Literaturverzeichnis

Aalbers, G., Abeele, M. M. P. vanden, Hendrickson, A. T., Marez, L. de, & Keijsers, L. (2022). Caught in the moment: Are there person-specific associations between momentary procrastination and passively measured smartphone use? Mobile Media & Communication, 10(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157921993896

Allison, P. D. (2009). Fixed effects regression models. SAGE Publications, Inc.

Allison, P. D. (2015). Don’t put lagged dependent variables in mixed models. https://statisticalhorizons.com/lagged-dependent-variables/

Alphen, T. van, Jak, S., Jansen in de Wal, J., Schuitema, J., & Peetsma, T. (2022). Determining reliability of daily measures: An illustration with data on teacher stress. Applied Measurement in Education, 35(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2022.2034822

Appel, M., Gnambs, T., Richter, T., & Green, M. C. (2015). The Transportation Scale–Short Form (TS–SF). Media Psychology, 18(2), 243–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2014.987400

Araujo, T., Ausloos, J., Atteveldt, W. van, Loecherbach, F., Moeller, J., Ohme, J., Trilling, D., Velde, B. van de, Vreese, C. de, & Welbers, K. (2022). OSD2F: An open-source data donation framework. Computational Communication Research, 4(2), 372–387. https://doi.org/10.5117/CCR2022.2.001.ARAU

Arend, M. G., & Schäfer, T. (2019). Statistical power in two-level models: A tutorial based on Monte Carlo simulation. Psychological Methods, 24(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000195

Asendorpf, J. B., Conner, M., De Fruyt, F., De Houwer, J., Denissen, J. J. A., Fiedler, K., Fiedler, S., Funder, D. C., Kliegl, R., Nosek, B. A., Perugini, M., Roberts, B. W., Schmitt, M., Van Aken, M. A. G., Weber, H., & Wicherts, J. M. (2013). Recommendations for increasing replicability in psychology. European Journal of Personality, 27(2), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1919

Bachl, M. (2014). Analyse rezeptionsbegleitend gemessener Kandidatenbewertungen in TV-Duellen. epubli GmbH.

Bäckström, M., & Björklund, F. (2021). Socially desirable responding in experience sampling: Consequences for personality research. Journal of Individual Differences, 42(4), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000342

Barta, W. D., Tennen, H., & Litt, M. D. (2012). Measurement reactivity in diary research. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Hrsg.), Handbook of Research Methods for Studying Daily Life (S. 108–123). The Guilford Press.

Bartolucci, F., Pennoni, F., & Farcomeni, A. (2012). Latent Markov models for longitudinal data. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.

Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

Baumgartner, S. E., Sumter, S. R., Petkevič, V., & Wiradhany, W. (2022). A novel iOS data donation approach: Automatic processing, compliance, and reactivity in a longitudinal study. Social Science Computer Review, 41(4), 1456–1472. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393211071068

Beatty, P. C., & Willis, G. B. (2007). Research synthesis: The practice of cognitive interviewing. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(2), 287–311. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfm006

Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of biomedical ethics (8th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Berger, U., Fehlinger, M., Mühleck, J., Wick, K., & Schwager, S. (2019). Inklusive Forschung: Validierung der Skala zur Allgemeinen Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung (SWE) in Leichter Sprache an einer Stichprobe von Schülerinnen und Schülern mit sonderpädagogischem Förderbedarf. PPmP - Psychotherapie · Psychosomatik · Medizinische Psychologie, 69(09/10), 398–406. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0831-2270

Berkel, N. van, Ferreira, D., & Kostakos, V. (2017). The experience sampling method on mobile devices. ACM Computing Surveys, 50(6), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1145/3123988

Berkel, N. van, Goncalves, J., Lovén, L., Ferreira, D., Hosio, S., & Kostakos, V. (2019). Effect of experience sampling schedules on response rate and recall accuracy of objective self-reports. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 125, 118–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.12.002

Beyens, I., Pouwels, J. L., Van Driel, I. I., Keijsers, L., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2024). Social media use and adolescents’ well-being: Developing a typology of person-specific effect patterns. Communication Research, 51(6), 691–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502211038196

Biemer, P. P. (2010). Total survey error: Design, implementation, and evaluation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74(5), 817–848. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfq058

Bigl, B., Gognelashvili, K., & Gehrau, V. (2024). Forschungsethik, Barrierefreiheit und inklusive Forschung in der Kommunikationswissenschaft. Publizistik, 69(3), 299–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-024-00854-7

Blair, E., & Burton, S. (1987). Cognitive processes used by survey respondents to answer behavioral frequency questions. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(2), 280. https://doi.org/10.1086/209112

Boase, J., & Ling, R. (2013). Measuring mobile phone use: Self-report versus log data. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(4), 508–519. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12021

Boeschoten, L., Ausloos, J., Möller, J. E., Araujo, T., & Oberski, D. L. (2022). A framework for privacy preserving digital trace data collection through data donation. Computational Communication Research, 4(2), 388–423. https://doi.org/10.5117/CCR2022.2.002.BOES

Boeschoten, L., De Schipper, N. C., Mendrik, A. M., Van Der Veen, E., Struminskaya, B., Janssen, H., & Araujo, T. (2023). Port: A software tool for digital data donation. Journal of Open Source Software, 8(90), 5596. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.05596

Bolger, N., Davis, A., & Rafaeli, E. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 579–616. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145030

Bolger, N., & Laurenceau, J.-P. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. Guilford Press.

Bortz, J., & Schuster, C. (2010). Statistik für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler (7th ed.). Springer.

Bradburn, N. M., Rips, L. J., & Shevell, S. K. (1987). Answering autobiographical questions: The impact of memory and inference on surveys. Science, 236(4798), 157–161. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3563494

Breuer, J., Baghal, T. A., Sloan, L., Bishop, L., Kondyli, D., & Linardis, A. (2021). Informed consent for linking survey and social media data - differences between platforms and data types. IASSIST Quarterly, 45(1). https://doi.org/10.29173/iq988

Breuer, J., Bishop, L., & Kinder-Kurlanda, K. (2020). The practical and ethical challenges in acquiring and sharing digital trace data: Negotiating public-private partnerships. New Media & Society, 22(11), 2058–2080. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820924622

Brosius, H.-B., Haas, A., & Unkel, J. (2022). Methoden der empirischen Kommunikationsforschung: Eine Einführung. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-34195-4

Brunswik, E. (1955). Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. Psychological Review, 62(3), 193–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047470

Burton, S., & Blair, E. (1991). Task conditions, response formulation processes, and response accuracy for behavioral frequency questions in surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55(1), 50–79. https://doi.org/10.1086/269241

Calamia, M. (2019). Practical considerations for evaluating reliability in ambulatory assessment studies. Psychological Assessment, 31(3), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000599

Capon, H., Hall, W., Fry, C., & Carter, A. (2016). Realising the technological promise of smartphones in addiction research and treatment: An ethical review. International Journal of Drug Policy, 36, 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.05.013

Carrière, T. C., Boeschoten, L., Struminskaya, B., Janssen, H. L., De Schipper, N. C., & Araujo, T. (2025). Best practices for studies using digital data donation. Quality & Quantity, 59(Suppl 1), 389–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-01983-x

Castro-Alvarez, S., Bringmann, L. F., Back, J., & Liu, S. (2026). The many reliabilities of psychological dynamics: An overview of statistical approaches to estimate the internal consistency reliability of intensive longitudinal data. Psychological Methods, 31(2), 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000778

Chang, L., & Krosnick, J. A. (2003). Measuring the frequency of regular behaviors: Comparing the “typical week” to the “past week”. Sociological Methodology, 33(1), 55–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0081-1750.2003.t01-1-00127.x

Chan-Olmsted, S., & Wang, R. (2022). Understanding podcast users: Consumption motives and behaviors. New Media & Society, 24(3), 684–704. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820963776

Chatfield, K., & Dove, E. (2023). Clarifying our policy on requiring ethics approval in submitted manuscripts. Research Ethics, 19(2), 103–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161231161402

Cheng, A., Zamarro, G., & Orriens, B. (2016). Personality as a predictor of unit nonresponse in panel data: An analysis of an internet-based survey. SSRN Electronic Journal, 49(3), 672–698. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2852614

Cho, G., Pasquini, Giancarlo., & Scott, S. B. (2019). Measurement burst designs in lifespan developmental research. In F. C. Worrell (Hg.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology. Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.348

Christner, C., Urman, A., Adam, S., & Maier, M. (2022). Automated tracking approaches for studying online media use: A critical review and recommendations. Communication Methods and Measures, 16(2), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2021.1907841

Coenen, L. (2022). The indirect effect is omitted variable bias. A cautionary note on the theoretical interpretation of products-of-coefficients in mediation analyses. European Journal of Communication, 37(6), 679–688. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231221082244

Colquitt, J. A., Sabey, T. B., Rodell, J. B., & Hill, E. T. (2019). Content validation guidelines: Evaluation criteria for definitional correspondence and definitional distinctiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(10), 1243–1265. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000406

Conner, T. S., & Lehman, B. J. (2012). Getting started: Launching a study in daily life. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Hrsg.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life. (S. 89–107). The Guilford Press.

Conner, T. S., & Reid, K. A. (2012). Effects of intensive mobile happiness reporting in daily life. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(3), 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611419677

Couper, M. P., Tourangeau, R., Conrad, F. G., & Singer, E. (2006). Evaluating the effectiveness of visual analog scales: A web experiment. Social Science Computer Review, 24(2), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439305281503

Courvoisier, D. S., Eid, M., & Lischetzke, T. (2012). Compliance to a cell phone-based ecological momentary assessment study: The effect of time and personality characteristics. Psychological Assessment, 24(3), 713–720. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026733

Craig, C. M., Brooks, M. E., & Bichard, S. (2023). Podcasting on purpose: Exploring motivations for podcast use among young adults. International Journal of Listening, 37(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2021.1913063

Cranford, J. A., Shrout, P. E., Iida, M., Rafaeli, E., Yip, T., & Bolger, N. (2006). A procedure for evaluating sensitivity to within-person change: Can mood measures in diary studies detect change reliably? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(7), 917–929. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206287721

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555

Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Kubey, R. (1981). Television and the rest of life: A systematic comparison of subjective experience. Public Opinion Quarterly, 45(3), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1086/268667

Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175(9), 526–536. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-198709000-00004

Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (2014). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. In M. Csikszentmihalyi (Hg.), Flow and the foundations of positive psychology (S. 35–54). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8_3

Cursio, J. F., Mermelstein, R. J., & Hedeker, D. (2019). Latent trait shared-parameter mixed models for missing ecological momentary assessment data. Statistics in Medicine, 38(4), 660–673. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.7989

Dal Cin, S., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2004). Narrative persuasion and overcoming resistance. In E. S. Knowles & J. A. Linn (Hrsg.), Resistance and persuasion (S. 175–191). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

De Calheiros Velozo, J., Niemeijer, K., & Vaessen, T. (2022). Passive sensing. In I. Myin-Germeys & P. Kuppens (Hrsg.), The Open Handbook of Experience Sampling Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide to Designing, Conducting, and Analyzing ESM Studies (S. 251–262). The Center for Research on Experience Sampling; Ambulatory Methods Leuven (REAL).

DeHaven, A. (2017). Preregistration: A plan, not a prison. https://www.cos.io/blog/preregistration-plan-not-prison

Dejonckheere, E., Demeyer, F., Geusens, B., Piot, M., Tuerlinckx, F., Verdonck, S., & Mestdagh, M. (2022). Assessing the reliability of single-item momentary affective measurements in experience sampling. Psychological Assessment, 34(12), 1138–1154. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001178

Desjarlais, M. (2024). Subtle momentary effects of social media experiences: An experience sampling study of posting and social comparisons on connectedness and self-esteem. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 29(3), zmae004. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmae004

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. (2025). Leitlinien zur Sicherung guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis: Kodex. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.14281892

Diamantopoulos, A., Sarstedt, M., Fuchs, C., Wilczynski, P., & Kaiser, S. (2012). Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: A predictive validity perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 434–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0300-3

Dienlin, T., Johannes, N., Bowman, N. D., Masur, P. K., Engesser, S., Kümpel, A. S., Lukito, J., Bier, L. M., Zhang, R., Johnson, B. K., Huskey, R., Schneider, F. M., Breuer, J., Parry, D. A., Vermeulen, I., Fisher, J. T., Banks, J., Weber, R., Ellis, D. A., … Vreese, C. de. (2021). An agenda for open science in communication. Journal of Communication, 71(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz052

Dogruel, L., & Schnauber-Stockmann, A. (2020). What determines instant messaging communication? Examining the impact of person- and situation-level factors on IM responsiveness. Mobile Media & Communication, 9(2), 210–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920943926

Döring, N., & Bortz, J. (2016). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41089-5

Driel, I. I. van, Giachanou, A., Pouwels, J. L., Boeschoten, L., Beyens, I., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2022). Promises and pitfalls of social media data donations. Communication Methods and Measures, 16(4), 266–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2022.2109608

Driver, C. C., & Voelkle, M. C. (2018). Hierarchical Bayesian continuous time dynamic modeling. Psychological Methods, 23(4), 774–799. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000168

Eble, M., Ziegele, M., & Jürgens, P. (2014). Forschung in geschlossenen Plattformen des Social Web. In M. Welker, M. Taddicken, J.-H. Schmidt, & N. Jackob (Hrsg.), Handbuch Online-Forschung (S. 123–149). von Halem.

Edwards, P. J., Roberts, I., Clarke, M. J., DiGuiseppi, C., Woolf, B., & Perkins, C. (2023). Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2023(11). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub5

Eisele, G., Hiekkaranta, A., Kunkels, Y. K., Rot, M. A. H., Van Ballegooijen, W., Bartels, S. L., Bastiaansen, J. A., Beymer, P. N., Bylsma, L. M., Carpenter, R. W., Ellison, W. D., Fisher, A. J., Forkmann, T., Frumkin, M. R., Fulford, D., Naragon-Gainey, K., Greene, T., Heininga, V. E., Jones, A., … Kirtley, O. J. (2025). ESM-q: A consensus-based quality assessment tool for experience sampling method items. Behavior Research Methods, 57(4), 124. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-025-02626-1

Eisele, G., Kasanova, Z., & Houben, M. (2022). Questionnaire design and evaluation. In I. Myin-Germeys & P. Kuppens (Hrsg.), The Open Handbook of Experience Sampling Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide to Designing, Conducting, and Analyzing ESM Studies (S. 71–90). The Center for Research on Experience Sampling; Ambulatory Methods Leuven (REAL).

Eisele, G., Vachon, H., Lafit, G., Kuppens, P., Houben, M., Myin-Germeys, I., & Viechtbauer, W. (2022). The effects of sampling frequency and questionnaire length on perceived burden, compliance, and careless responding in experience sampling data in a student population. Assessment, 29(2), 136–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191120957102

Enders, C. K. (2022). Applied missing data analysis (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.

Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121

Ernst, A., Dietrich, F., Rohr, B., Reinecke, L., & Scharkow, M. (2026). Revisiting the digital jukebox in daily life: Applying mood management theory to algorithmically curated music streaming environments. Human Communication Research, hqaf030. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqaf030

Ernst, A., & Schnauber-Stockmann, A. (2026). Won’t stop ’til you get enough? Determinants of disengaging from mobile media apps in daily life. Communication Research, 53(5), 659–686. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502251378582

Ess, C. M. (2019). Internet research ethics and social media. In R. Iphofen (Hg.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_12-1

Eveland, W. P. Jr., & Morey, A. C. (2010). Challenges and opportunities of panel designs. In E. P. Bucy & R. L. Holbert (Hrsg.), Sourcebook for Political Communication Research: Methods, Measures, and Analytical Techniques (S. 19–33). Routledge.

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using g*power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149

Faulbaum, F. (2019). Methodische Grundlagen der Umfrageforschung. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93278-1

Fecke, M., Fehr, A., & Schlütz, D. (2024). Die Mobile Experience Sampling Methode (MESM) in der Kinder- und Jugendmedienforschung: Chancen und Herausforderungen. MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift Für Theorie Und Praxis Der Medienbildung, 60, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.21240/mpaed/60/2024.04.21.X

Felderer, B., Birg, A., & Kreuter, F. (2019). Paradaten. In N. Baur & J. Blasius (Hrsg.), Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung (S. 413–422). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21308-4_29

Field, A. (2026). Discovering Statistics Using R and RStudio (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.

Fox, J., Pearce, K. E., Massanari, A. L., Riles, J. M., Szulc, Ł., Ranjit, Y. S., Trevisan, F., Soriano, C. R. R., Vitak, J., Arora, P., Ahn, S. J. (Grace)., Alper, M., Gambino, A., Gonzalez, C., Lynch, T., Williamson, L. D., & L. Gonzales, A. (2021). Open science, closed doors? Countering marginalization through an agenda for ethical, inclusive research in communication. Journal of Communication, 71(5), 764–784. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab029

Franzke, A. S., Muis, I., & Schäfer, M. T. (2021). Data ethics decision aid (DEDA): A dialogical framework for ethical inquiry of AI and data projects in the netherlands. Ethics and Information Technology, 23(3), 551–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-020-09577-5

Fritz, J., Piccirillo, M. L., Cohen, Z. D., Frumkin, M., Kirtley, O., Moeller, J., Neubauer, A. B., Norris, L. A., Schuurman, N. K., Snippe, E., & Bringmann, L. F. (2024). So you want to do ESM? 10 essential topics for implementing the experience-sampling method. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459241267912

Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M., Skouteris, H., Richardson, B., Blore, J., Holmes, M., & Mills, J. (2013). Does the burden of the experience sampling method undermine data quality in state body image research? Body Image, 10(4), 607–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2013.06.003

Gabriel, A. S., Podsakoff, N. P., Beal, D. J., Scott, B. A., Sonnentag, S., Trougakos, J. P., & Butts, M. M. (2018). Experience sampling methods: A discussion of critical trends and considerations for scholarly advancement. Organizational Research Methods, 22(4), 969–1006. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428118802626

Gajic, A., Cameron, D., & Hurley, J. (2012). The cost-effectiveness of cash versus lottery incentives for a web-based, stated-preference community survey. The European Journal of Health Economics, 13(6), 789–799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-011-0332-0

Gehrau, V., Maubach, K., & Fujarski, S. (2022). Einfache Datenauswertung mit R: Eine Einführung in uni- und bivariate Statistik sowie Datendarstellung mit RStudio und R Markdown. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-34285-2

Geldhof, G. J., Preacher, K. J., & Zyphur, M. J. (2014). Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework. Psychological Methods, 19(1), 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032138

Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge Univ. Press.

Goodboy, A. K., & Martin, M. M. (2020). Omega over alpha for reliability estimation of unidimensional communication measures. Annals of the International Communication Association, 44(4), 422–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1846135

Göritz, A. S. (2008). The long-term effect of material incentives on participation in online panels. Field Methods, 20(3), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X08317069

Göritz, A. S., & Neumann, B. P. (2016). The longitudinal effects of incentives on response quantity in online panels. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 2(2), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000071

Groves, R. M., & Lyberg, L. (2010). Total survey error: Past, present, and future. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74(5), 849–879. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfq065

Groves, R. M., Cialdini, R. B., & Couper, M. P. (1992). Understanding the decision to participate in a survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56(4), 475. https://doi.org/10.1086/269338

Groves, R. M., & Couper, M. (1998). Nonresponse in household interview surveys. Wiley.

Grund, S., Lüdtke, O., & Robitzsch, A. (2018). Multiple imputation of missing data for multilevel models: Simulations and recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 21(1), 111–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428117703686

Ha, L., Hu, X., Fang, L., Henize, S., Park, S., Stana, A., & Zhang, X. (2015). Use of survey research in top mass communication journals 2001–2010 and the total survey error paradigm. Review of Communication, 15(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2015.1014401

Hagenaars, J., & Mccutcheon, A. (2003). Applied latent class analysis models. Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie, 28(4), 584–586. https://doi.org/10.2307/3341848

Haim, M., Leiner, D., & Hase, V. (2023). Integrating data donations in online surveys. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 71(1-2), 130–137. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2023-1-2-130

Hall, J. A., Kearney, M. W., & Xing, C. (2019). Two tests of social displacement through social media use. Information, Communication & Society, 22(10), 1396–1413. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1430162

Harari, G. M., Lane, N. D., Wang, R., Crosier, B. S., Campbell, A. T., & Gosling, S. D. (2016). Using smartphones to collect behavioral data in psychological science: Opportunities, practical considerations, and challenges. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(6), 838–854. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616650285

Harari, G. M., Müller, S. R., Aung, M. S., & Rentfrow, P. J. (2017). Smartphone sensing methods for studying behavior in everyday life. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 18, 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.07.018

Hartmann, T., & Reinecke, L. (2013). Skalenkonstruktion in der Kommunikationswissenschaft. In W. Möhring & D. Schlütz (Hrsg.), Handbuch standardisierte Erhebungsverfahren in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (S. 41–60). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18776-1_3

Hase, V., & Haim, M. (2024). Can we get rid of bias? Mitigating systematic error in data donation studies through survey design strategies. Computational Communication Research, 6(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.5117/ccr2024.2.2.hase

Heise, N., & Schmidt, J.-H. (2014). Ehtik der Online-Forschung. In M. Welker, M. Taddicken, J.-H. Schmidt, & N. Jackob (Hrsg.), Handbuch Online-Forschung (S. 519–539). von Halem.

Hektner, J. M., Schmidt, J. A., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2007). Experience sampling method: Measuring the quality of everyday life. Sage Publications.

Hennig, C., Meila, M., Murtagh, F., & Rocci, R. (2015). Handbook of cluster analysis. CRC Press.

Hoplamazian, G. J., Dimmick, J., Ramirez, A., & Feaster, J. (2018). Capturing mobility: The time–space diary as a method for assessing media use niches. Mobile Media & Communication, 6(1), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157917731484

Hox, J. J., Moerbeek, M., & Schoot, R. van de. (2017). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315650982

Hu, Y., Nesselroade, J. R., Erbacher, M. K., Boker, S. M., Burt, S. A., Keel, P. K., Neale, M. C., Sisk, C. L., & Klump, K. (2016). Test reliability at the individual level. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(4), 532–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2016.1148605

Hyers, L. (2018). Diary methods (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190256692.001.0001

Jäckle, A., & Lynn, P. (2008). Respondent incentives in a multi-mode panel survey: Cumulative effects on nonresponse and bias. Survey Methodology, 34(1), 105–117.

Jacobson, N. C., Bentley, K. H., Walton, A., Wang, S. B., Fortgang, R. G., Millner, A. J., Coombs, G., Rodman, A. M., & Coppersmith, D. D. L. (2020). Ethical dilemmas posed by mobile health and machine learning in psychiatry research. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 98(4), 270–276. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.19.237107

Jaso, B. A., Kraus, N. I., & Heller, A. S. (2022). Identification of careless responding in ecological momentary assessment research: From posthoc analyses to real-time data monitoring. Psychological Methods, 27(6), 958–981. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000312

Ji, L., Chow, S.-M., Schermerhorn, A. C., Jacobson, N. C., & Cummings, E. M. (2018). Handling missing data in the modeling of intensive longitudinal data. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25(5), 715–736. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1417046

Johannes, N., Meier, A., Reinecke, L., Ehlert, S., Setiawan, D. N., Walasek, N., Dienlin, T., Buijzen, M., & Veling, H. (2021). The relationship between online vigilance and affective well-being in everyday life: Combining smartphone logging with experience sampling. Media Psychology, 24(5), 581–605. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2020.1768122

Jones, A., Remmerswaal, D., Verveer, I., Robinson, E., Franken, I. H. A., Wen, C. K. F., & Field, M. (2019). Compliance with ecological momentary assessment protocols in substance users: A meta-analysis. Addiction, 114(4), 609–619. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14503

Kahlor, L., Dunwoody, S., Griffin, R. J., Neuwirth, K., & Giese, J. (2003). Studying heuristic-systematic processing of risk communication. Risk Analysis, 23(2), 355–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/1539-6924.00314

Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science, 306(5702), 1776–1780. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1103572

Karnowski, V., Knop-Huelss, K., & Olbermann, Z. (2024). Mobile news access, mobile news repertoires, and users’ tendency to talk about the news – an experience sampling study on mobile news consumption. Online Media and Global Communication, 3(2), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.1515/omgc-2023-0051

Karnowski, V., Kümpel, A. S., Leonhard, L., & Leiner, D. J. (2017). From incidental news exposure to news engagement: How perceptions of the news post and news usage patterns influence engagement with news articles encountered on facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.041

Karnowski, V., Naab, T. K., & Schlütz, D. (2019). On the challenges of measuring mobile social media use: Explaining differences between data from surveys and mobile experience sampling. In C. Peter, T. K. Naab, & R. Kühne (Hrsg.), Measuring media use and exposure – recent challenges and developments (S. 59–89). von Halem.

Karnowski, V., & Von Pape, T. (2009). MobileTV im Alltag der Nutzer: Ergebnisse einer dreimonatigen Panelstudie. In J. Krone (Hg.), Fernsehen im Wandel. Mobile TV & IPTV in Deutschland und österreich (S. 241–257). Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845217901-241

Karsay, K., Matthes, J., Schmuck, D., & Ecklebe, S. (2023). Messaging, posting, and browsing: A mobile experience sampling study investigating youth’s social media use, affective well-being, and loneliness. Social Science Computer Review, 41(4), 1493–1513. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393211058308

Keusch, F. (2015). Why do people participate in web surveys? Applying survey participation theory to internet survey data collection. Management Review Quarterly, 65(3), 183–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-014-0111-y

Keusch, F., & Conrad, F. G. (2022). Using smartphones to capture and combine self-reports and passively measured behavior in social research. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 10(4), 863–885. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smab035

Keusch, F., & Kreuter, F. (2021). Digital trace data. In U. Engel, A. Quan-Haase, S. X. Liu, & L. Lyberg (Hrsg.), Handbook of Computational Social Science, Volume 1 (1st ed., S. 100–118). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003024583-8

Keusch, F., Struminskaya, B., Antoun, C., Couper, M. P., & Kreuter, F. (2019). Willingness to participate in passive mobile data collection. Public Opinion Quarterly, 83(S1), 210–235. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfz007

Kibuchi, E., Sturgis, P., Durrant, G. B., & Maslovskaya, O. (2020). Do interviewers moderate the effect of monetary incentives on response rates in household interview surveys? Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 8(2), 264–284. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smy026

Kim, Y., Dykema, J., Stevenson, J., Black, P., & Moberg, D. P. (2019). Straightlining: Overview of measurement, comparison of indicators, and effects in mail–web mixed-mode surveys. Social Science Computer Review, 37(2), 214–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439317752406

Kimhy, D., Vakhrusheva, J., Jobson-Ahmed, L., Tarrier, N., Malaspina, D., & Gross, J. J. (2012). Emotion awareness and regulation in individuals with schizophrenia: Implications for social functioning. Psychiatry Research, 200(2-3), 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2012.05.029

Kirtley, O. J. (2022). Ethical issues in experience sampling method research. In I. Myin-Germeys & P. Kuppens (Hrsg.), The Open Handbook of Experience Sampling Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide to Designing, Conducting, and Analyzing ESM Studies (S. 91–101). The center for Research on Experience sampling; Ambulatory methods Leuven (REAL).

Kirtley, O. J., Lafit, G., Achterhof, R., Hiekkaranta, A. P., & Myin-Germeys, I. (2021). Making the black box transparent: A template and tutorial for registration of studies using experience-sampling methods. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920924686

Kline, R. B. (2015). The mediation myth. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37(4), 202–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2015.1049349

Klingelhoefer, J., Gilbert, A., Adrian, C., & Meier, A. (2026). Possible futures all at once: Time frame and time lag in short-term longitudinal media effects research on well-being. Journal of Communication, 76(1), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaf037

Klingelhoefer, J., Gilbert, A., & Meier, A. (2024). Momentary motivations for digital disconnection: An experience sampling study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 29(5), zmae013. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmae013

Knobloch, S. (2003). Mood adjustment via mass communication. Journal of Communication, 53(2), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02588.x

Koch, C., Frei, N. K., & Herrmann, I. (2021). Das Smartphone-Tagebuch in der Mediennutzungsforschung. Ein qualitativer Methodenansatz unter der Lupe. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 69(2), 299–319. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2021-2-299

Koch, T., Seeger, C., & Müller, P. (2025). Das Experiment in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-49131-4

König, L. M., Allmeta, A., Christlein, N., Van Emmenis, M., & Sutton, S. (2022). A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of reactivity to digital in-the-moment measurement of health behaviour. Health Psychology Review, 16(4), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2022.2047096

Korotitsch, W. J., & Nelson-Gray, R. O. (1999). An overview of self-monitoring research in assessment and treatment. Psychological Assessment, 11(4), 415–425. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.11.4.415

Krosnick, J. A. (1991). Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5(3), 213–236. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350050305

Krosnick, J. A. (1999). Survey research. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 537–567. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.537

Krumpal, I. (2013). Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: A literature review. Quality & Quantity, 47(4), 2025–2047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9640-9

Kubey, R., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Television and the quality of life: How viewing shapes everyday experience. Erlbaum.

Kubey, R., Larson, R., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Experience sampling method applications to communication research questions. Journal of Communication, 46(2), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01476.x

Kupferschmitt, T. (2024). ARD/ZDF-Medienstudie 2024: Trends bei Video- und Audioplattformen. Media Perspektiven, (26), 1–9.

Kuppens, P., & Myin-Germeys, I. (2022). Research questions that can be answered with ESM research. In I. Myin-Germeys & P. Kuppens (Hrsg.), The Open Handbook of Experience Sampling Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide to Designing, Conducting, and Analyzing ESM Studies (S. 21–32). The Center for Research on Experience Sampling; Ambulatory Methods Leuven (REAL).

Lafit, G. (2022). Non-normal, higherlevel, and VAR(1) models for the analysis of ESM data. In I. Myin-Germeys & P. Kuppens (Hrsg.), The Open Handbook of Experience Sampling Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide to Designing, Conducting, and Analyzing ESM Studies (S. 185–216). The Center for Research on Experience Sampling; Ambulatory Methods Leuven (REAL).

Lafit, G., Artner, R., & Ceulemans, E. (2024). Enabling analytical power calculations for multilevel models with autocorrelated errors through deriving and approximating the precision matrix. Behavior Research Methods, 56(7), 8105–8131. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-024-02435-y

Lahman, M. (2018). Ethics in Social Science Research: Becoming Culturally Responsive. SAGE.

Lai, M. H. C. (2021). Composite reliability of multilevel data: It’s about observed scores and construct meanings. Psychological Methods, 26(1), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000287

Lakens, D. (2022). Sample size justification. Collabra: Psychology, 8(1), 33267. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.33267

Lakens, D. (2024). When and how to deviate from a preregistration. Collabra: Psychology, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.117094

Langener, A. M., Siepe, B. S., Elsherif, M., Niemeijer, K., Andresen, P. K., Akre, S., Bringmann, L. F., Cohen, Z. D., Choukas, N. R., Drexl, K., Fassi, L., Green, J., Hoffmann, T., Jagesar, R. R., Kas, M. J. H., Kurten, S., Schoedel, R., Stulp, G., Turner, G., & Jacobson, N. C. (2024). A template and tutorial for preregistering studies using passive smartphone measures. Behavior Research Methods, 56(8), 8289–8307. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-024-02474-5

Langer, W. (2009). Mehrebenenanalyse: Eine Einführung für Forschung und Praxis (2nd ed.). VS Verl. für Sozialwiss.

Larroulet Philippi, C. (2021). On measurement scales: Neither ordinal nor interval? Philosophy of Science, 88(5), 929–939. https://doi.org/10.1086/714873

Larson, R., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1983). The experience sampling method. In Harry T. Reis (Hg.), Naturalistic approaches to studying social interaction (S. 41–56). Jossey-Bass.

Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. Columbia University Press.

Lee, C., Hornik, R., & Hennessy, M. (2008). The reliability and stability of general media exposure measures. Communication Methods and Measures, 2(1-2), 6–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312450802063024

Leiner, D. (2024). SoSci survey (version 3.5.01). https://www.soscisurvey.de

Leonelli, S., Lovell, R., Wheeler, B. W., Fleming, L., & Williams, H. (2021). From FAIR data to fair data use: Methodological data fairness in health-related social media research. Big Data & Society, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211010310

Lewin, K. (1939). Field theory and experiment in social psychology: Concepts and methods. American Journal of Sociology, 44(6), 868–896. https://doi.org/10.1086/218177

Lin, X., Mermelstein, R., & Hedeker, D. (2018). A shared parameter location scale mixed effect model for EMA data subject to informative missing. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 18(4), 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-018-0184-5

Link, E. (2026). Single episodes of health information seeking, scanning, and avoidance: Findings of an experience sampling methods study of German residents suffering from acute or chronic illness. Communication Research, 53(2), 151–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502251328717

Locatelli, E., Franzke, A. S., & Ess, C. M. (2023). Introduction. Over twenty years of internet research ethics: key concepts and future challenges. Comunicazioni Sociali, (2), 131–138. https://publicatt.unicatt.it/handle/10807/270782

Longhi, S. (2017). Panel research methods. In J. Matthes, C. S. Davis, & R. F. Potter (Hrsg.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0179

Lozano, L. M., García-Cueto, E., & Muñiz, J. (2008). Effect of the number of response categories on the reliability and validity of rating scales. Methodology, 4(2), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.4.2.73

Lukočienė, O., Varriale, R., & Vermunt, J. K. (2010). The simultaneous decision(s) about the number of lower- and higher-level classes in multilevel latent class analysis. Sociological Methodology, 40(1), 247–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9531.2010.01231.x

Lynn, P. (2009). Methods for longitudinal surveys. In P. Lynn (Hg.), Methodology of Longitudinal Surveys (1st ed., S. 1–19). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470743874.ch1

Lyrvall, J., Di Mari, R., Bakk, Z., Oser, J., & Kuha, J. (n.d.). multilevLCA: An R package for single-level and multilevel latent class analysis with covariates. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2305.07276

Maas, C. J. M., & Hox, J. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology, 1(3), 86–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86

Marciano, L., Driver, C. C., Schulz, P. J., & Camerini, A.-L. (2022). Dynamics of adolescents’ smartphone use and well-being are positive but ephemeral. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 1316. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05291-y

Masur, P. K. (2019a). Capturing situational dynamics and processes: Strengths and pitfalls of the experience sampling method. In P. Müller, S. Geiß, C. Schemer, T. K. Naab, & C. Peter (Hrsg.), Dynamische Prozesse der öffentlichen Kommunikation. Methodische Herausforderungen (S. 174–212). von Halem.

Masur, P. K. (2019b). Situational privacy and self-disclosure: Communication processes in online environments. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Matthes, J., Marquart, F., Naderer, B., Arendt, F., Schmuck, D., & Adam, K. (2015). Questionable research practices in experimental communication research: A systematic analysis from 1980 to 2013. Communication Methods and Measures, 9(4), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2015.1096334

Matthews, R. A., Pineault, L., & Hong, Y.-H. (2022). Normalizing the use of single-item measures: Validation of the single-item compendium for organizational psychology. Journal of Business and Psychology, 37(4), 639–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-022-09813-3

May, M., Junghaenel, D. U., Ono, M., Stone, A. A., & Schneider, S. (2018). Ecological momentary assessment methodology in chronic pain research: A systematic review. The Journal of Pain: Official Journal of the American Pain Society, 19(7), 699–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2018.01.006

McCarthy, D. E., Minami, H., Yeh, V. M., & Bold, K. W. (2015). An experimental investigation of reactivity to ecological momentary assessment frequency among adults trying to quit smoking. Addiction, 110(10), 1549–1560. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.12996

McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410601087

McKee, H. A., & Porter, J. E. (2009). The Ethics of Internet Research: A Rhetorical, Case-based Process. Peter Lang.

McNeish, D., & Hamaker, E. L. (2020). A primer on two-level dynamic structural equation models for intensive longitudinal data in mplus. Psychological Methods, 25(5), 610–635. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000250

Meade, A. W., & Craig, S. B. (2012). Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 437–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028085

Mehl, M. R., & Conner, T. S. (Hrsg.). (2012). Handbook of Research Methods for Studying Daily Life. The Guilford Press.

Meier, A. (2022). Studying problems, not problematic usage: Do mobile checking habits increase procrastination and decrease well-being? Mobile Media & Communication, 10(2), 272–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579211029326

Meltzer, C. E., Naab, T., & Daschmann, G. (2012). All student samples differ: On participant selection in communication science. Communication Methods and Measures, 6(4), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2012.732625

Merrilees, C. E., Goeke-Morey, M., & Mark Cummings, E. (2008). Do event-contingent diaries about marital conflict change marital interactions? Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46(2), 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2007.11.007

MeTag | MeSoftware. (n.d.). Retrieved https://mesoftware.org/index.php/metag/

Mikesell, L., Marti, F. A., Guzmán, J. R., McCreary, M., & Zima, B. (2018). Affordances of mHealth technology and the structuring of clinic communication. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 46(3), 323–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2018.1465195

Möhring, W., & Schlütz, D. (Hrsg.). (2013a). Handbuch standardisierte Erhebungsverfahren in der Kommunikationswissenschaft. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18776-1

Möhring, W., & Schlütz, D. (2013b). Standardisierte Befragung – Messmethodik und Designs in der Medienwirkungsforschung. In W. Schweiger & A. Fahr (Hrsg.), Handbuch Medienwirkungsforschung (S. 565–579). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18967-3_30

Möhring, W., & Schlütz, D. (2025). Die Befragung in der Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaft: Eine praxisorientierte Einführung. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-44191-3

Morehouse, K. N., Kurdi, B., & Nosek, B. A. (2024). Responsible data sharing: Identifying and remedying possible re-identification of human participants. American Psychologist, 80(6), 928–941. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001346

Morren, M., Dulmen, S. van, Ouwerkerk, J., & Bensing, J. (2009). Compliance with momentary pain measurement using electronic diaries: A systematic review. European Journal of Pain, 13(4), 354–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.05.010

Moskowitz, D. S., Russell, J. J., Sadikaj, G., & Sutton, R. (2009). Measuring people intensively. Canadian Psychology / Psychologie Canadienne, 50(3), 131. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016625

Müller, S., Bayer, J., Ross, M. Q., Mount, J., Stachl, C., Harari, G. M., Chang, Y.-J., & Le, H. T. K. (2021). Analyzing GPS data for psychological research: A tutorial. https://osf.io/rekuw/

Muthén, B. O. (2002). Beyond SEM: General latent variable modeling. Behaviormetrika, 29(1), 81–117. https://doi.org/10.2333/bhmk.29.81

Myin-Germeys, I., & Kuppens, P. (2022a). Experience sampling methods, and introduction. In I. Myin-Germeys & P. Kuppens (Hrsg.), The Open Handbook of Experience Sampling Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide to Designing, Conducting, and Analyzing ESM Studies (S. 7–19). The Center for Research on Experience Sampling; Ambulatory Methods Leuven (REAL).

Myin-Germeys, I., & Kuppens, P. (Hrsg.). (2022b). The open handbook of experience sampling methodology: A step-by-step guide to designing, conducting, and analyzing ESM studies. The Center for Research on Experience Sampling; Ambulatory Methods Leuven (REAL).

Naab, T. K. (2013). Gewohnheiten und Rituale der Fernsehnutzung: theoretische Konzeption und methodische Perspektiven (1st ed.). Nomos.

Naab, T. K., Karnowski, V., & Schlütz, D. (2019). Reporting mobile social media use: How survey and experience sampling measures differ. Communication Methods and Measures, 13(2), 126–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2018.1555799

Nestler, S. (2021). Modeling intraindividual variability in growth with measurement burst designs. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 28(1), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2020.1757455

Neubauer, A. B., & Schmiedek, F. (2020). Studying within-person variation and within-person couplings in intensive longitudinal data: Lessons learned and to be learned. Gerontology, 66(4), 332–339. https://doi.org/10.1159/000507993

Neubauer, A. B., Voelkle, M. C., Voss, A., & Mertens, U. K. (2020). Estimating reliability of within-person couplings in a multilevel framework. Journal of Personality Assessment, 102(1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1521418

Nezlek, J. B. (2017). A practical guide to understanding reliability in studies of within-person variability. Journal of Research in Personality, 69, 149–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.06.020

Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84(3), 231–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231

Nock, M. K., Kleiman, E. M., Abraham, M., Bentley, K. H., Brent, D. A., Buonopane, R. J., Castro-Ramirez, F., Cha, C. B., Dempsey, W., Draper, J., Glenn, C. R., Harkavy-Friedman, J., Hollander, M. R., Huffman, J. C., Lee, H. I. S., Millner, A. J., Mou, D., Onnela, J.-P., Picard, R. W., … Pearson, J. L. (2021). Consensus statement on ethical & safety practices for conducting digital monitoring studies with people at risk of suicide and related behaviors. Psychiatric Research and Clinical Practice, 3(2), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.prcp.20200029

Nosek, B. A., Alter, G., Banks, G. C., Borsboom, D., Bowman, S. D., Breckler, S. J., Buck, S., Chambers, C. D., Chin, G., Christensen, G., Contestabile, M., Dafoe, A., Eich, E., Freese, J., Glennerster, R., Goroff, D., Green, D. P., Hesse, B., Humphreys, M., … Yarkoni, T. (2015). Promoting an open research culture. Science, 348(6242), 1422–1425. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab2374

Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114

Ohme, J., Araujo, T., Boeschoten, L., Freelon, D., Ram, N., Reeves, B. B., & Robinson, T. N. (2024). Digital trace data collection for social media effects research: APIs, data donation, and (screen) tracking. Communication Methods and Measures, 18(2), 124–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2023.2181319

Ono, M., Schneider, S., Junghaenel, D. U., & Stone, A. A. (2019). What affects the completion of ecological momentary assessments in chronic pain research? An individual patient data meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(2), e11398. https://doi.org/10.2196/11398

Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716

Otto, L. P., Thomas, F., Maier, M., & Ottenstein, C. (2020). Only one moment in time? Investigating the dynamic relationship of emotions and attention toward political information with mobile experience sampling. Communication Research, 47(8), 1131–1154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219872392

Palmier-Claus, J. E., Myin-Germeys, I., Barkus, E., Bentley, L., Udachina, A., Delespaul, P. A. E. G., Lewis, S. W., & Dunn, G. (2011). Experience sampling research in individuals with mental illness: Reflections and guidance. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 123(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2010.01596.x

Park, J., & Yu, H.-T. (2018). Recommendations on the sample sizes for multilevel latent class models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 78(5), 737–761. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164417719111

Patrick, M. E., Singer, E., Boyd, C. J., Cranford, J. A., & McCabe, S. E. (2013). Incentives for college student participation in web-based substance use surveys. Addictive Behaviors, 38(3), 1710–1714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.08.007

Penner, L. A., Shiffman, S., Paty, J. A., & Fritzsche, B. A. (1994). Individual differences in intraperson variability in mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(4), 712–721. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.712

Pentzold, C. (2015). Forschungsethische Prämissen und Problemfelder teilnehmenden Beobachtens auf Online-Plattformen. In A. Maireder, J. Ausserhofer, C. Schumann, & M. Taddicken (Hrsg.), Digitale Methoden in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (S. 61–85). FU Berlin. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17174/dcr.v2.4

Perks, L. G., & Turner, J. S. (2019). Podcasts and productivity: A qualitative uses and gratifications study. Mass Communication and Society, 22(1), 96–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2018.1490434

Perrault, E. K., & McCullock, S. P. (2019). Concise consent forms appreciated – still not comprehended: Applying revised common rule guidelines in online studies. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 14(4), 299–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619853453

Perrault, E. K., & Nazione, S. A. (2016). Informed consent – uninformed participants: Shortcomings of online social science consent forms and recommendations for improvement. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 11(3), 274–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264616654610

Peters, G.-J. (2018). The alpha and the omega of scale reliability and validity: Why and how to abandon cronbach’s alpha and the route towards more comprehensive assessment of scale quality. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/h47fv

Pfiffner, N., Witlox, P., & Friemel, T. N. (2024). Data donation module: A web application for collecting and enriching data donations. Computational Communication Research, 6(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.5117/CCR2024.2.4.PFIF

Pieters, R. (2017). Meaningful mediation analysis: Plausible causal inference and informative communication. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(3), 692–716. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx081

Pigg, S., Grabill, J. T., Brunk-Chavez, B., Moore, J. L., Rosinski, P., & Curran, P. G. (2014). Ubiquitous writing, technologies, and the social practice of literacies of coordination. Written Communication, 31(1), 91–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088313514023

Porst, R. (2014). Fragebogen: Ein Arbeitsbuch. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02118-4

Porter, S. R., Whitcomb, M. E., & Weitzer, W. H. (2004). Multiple surveys of students and survey fatigue. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2004(121), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.101

Prior, M. (2009). Improving media effects research through better measurement of news exposure. The Journal of Politics, 71(3), 893–908. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381609090781

R Core Team. (2025). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.R-project.org/

Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the big five inventory in english and german. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001

Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., Cheong, Y. F., & Congdon, R. (2019). HLM 8 for windows. Scientific Software International, Inc.

Reichow, D., & Friemel, T. N. (2020). Mobile communication, social presence, and perceived security on public transport. Mobile Media & Communication, 8(2), 268–292. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157919878759

Reinecke, L., & Hofmann, W. (2016). Slacking off or winding down? An experience sampling study on the drivers and consequences of media use for recovery versus procrastination. Human Communication Research, 42(3), 441–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12082

Reis, H. T., & Gable, S. L. (2000). Event-sampling and other methods for studying everyday experience. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Hrsg.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (S. 190–222). Cambridge University Press.

Reis, H. T. (2012). Why researchers should think "real-world": A conceptual rationale. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Hrsg.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life. (S. 3–21). The Guilford Press.

Revelle, W. (2024). Psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research. 10.32614/CRAN.package.psych

Revelle, W., & Wilt, J. (2019). Analyzing dynamic data: A tutorial. Personality and Individual Differences, 136, 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.08.020

Revol, J., Carlier, C., Lafit, G., Verhees, M., Sels, L., & Ceulemans, E. (2024). Preprocessing experience-sampling-method data: A step-by-step framework, tutorial website, R package, and reporting templates. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459241256609

Reynolds, B. M., Robles, T. F., & Repetti, R. L. (2016). Measurement reactivity and fatigue effects in daily diary research with families. Developmental Psychology, 52, 442–456. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000081

Rintala, A., Wampers, M., Myin-Germeys, I., & Viechtbauer, W. (2019). Response compliance and predictors thereof in studies using the experience sampling method. Psychological Assessment, 31, 226–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000662

Robbins, M. L. (2017). Practical suggestions for legal and ethical concerns with social environment sampling methods. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(5), 573–580. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617699253

Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1

Roberts, C., Gilbert, E., Allum, N., & Eisner, L. (2019). Research synthesis: Satisficing in surveys: A systematic review of the literature. Public Opinion Quarterly, 83(3), 598–626. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfz035

Roehse, E.-M., Möhring, W., Zillich, A. F., Schlütz, D., & Link, E. (2023). Forschungsethische Praxis in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft – ein Einblick in die Sicht der Forschenden. Publizistik, 68(4), 459–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-023-00820-9

Roekel, E. van, Keijsers, L., & Chung, J. M. (2019). A review of current ambulatory assessment studies in adolescent samples and practical recommendations. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 29(3), 560–577. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12471

Rohrer, J. M., & Murayama, K. (2023). These are not the effects you are looking for: Causality and the within-/between-persons distinction in longitudinal data analysis. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459221140842

Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (2014). Ethical principles in data analysis: An overview. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203840023.ch3

Roßmann, J. (2017). Satisficing in Befragungen: Theorie, Messung und Erklärung. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16668-7

Samuel-Azran, T., Laor, T., & Tal, D. (2019). Who listens to podcasts, and why? The israeli case. Online Information Review, 43(4), 482–495. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-04-2017-0119

Sand, M., & Braun, M. (2025). Mehrebenenanalyse: Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung mit R. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-47710-3

Sauer, S. (2019). Moderne Datenanalyse mit R: Daten einlesen, aufbereiten, visualisieren, modellieren und kommunizieren. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21587-3

Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7(2), 147–177. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.2.147

Scherer, H., & Naab, T. K. (2013). Messen im Zeitverlauf. In W. Möhring & D. Schlütz (Hrsg.), Handbuch standardisierte Erhebungsverfahren in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (S. 103–123). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18776-1_6

Scherer, H., & Schlütz, D. (2002). Gratifikation à la minute: Die zeitnahe Erfassung von Gratifikationen. In P. Rössler, S. Kubisch, & V. Gehrau (Hrsg.), Empirische Perspektiven der Rezeptionsforschung (S. 133–151). Reinhard Fischer.

Schlütz, D. (2002). Bildschirmspiele und ihre Faszination: Zuwendungsmotive, Gratifikationen und Erleben interaktiver Medienangebote. R. Fischer.

Schlütz, D., & Möhring, W. (2016). Kommunikationswissenschaftliche Forschungsethik – Sonntagsworte, Selbstzweck, Notwendigkeit? Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 64(4), 483–496. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2016-4-483

Schlütz, D., & Möhring, W. (2017). Das rad rollt! Eine Antwort und weiterführende Überlegungen zu dem Diskussionsbeitrag von Nele Heise in diesem Heft. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 65(4), 779–783. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2017-4-779

Schlütz, D., & Möhring, W. (2018). Between the devil and the deep blue sea: Negotiating ethics and method in communication research practice. Studies in Communication and Media, 7(1), 31–58. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2018-1-31

Schlütz, D., & Möhring, W. (2025). Forschungsethische Aspekte und Herausforderungen von Online-Kommunikation. In W. Schweiger, K. Beck, & V. Karnowski (Hrsg.), Handbuch Online-Kommunikation (S. 1–20). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18017-1_38-1

Schlütz, D., & Scherer, H. (2001). Der Einsatz der ’Experience Sampling Method’ in der Medienwissenschaft. Zeitschrift Für Medienpsychologie, 13 (N.F. 1)(3), 146–149.

Schlütz, D., Schnauber-Stockmann, A., Karnowski, V., & Naab, T. K. (2027). Experiencing podcasts in situ: How the reception situation affects transportation. Studies in Communication and Media.

Schlütz, D., & Zillich, A. F. (2023). Forschungsethik und wissenschaftliche Integrität: Herausforderungen und Chancen für Forschung in und mit digitalen Medien. In S. Stollfuß, L. Niebling, & F. Raczkowski (Hrsg.), Handbuch Digitale Medien und Methoden (S. 1–18). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-36629-2_8-1

Schmiedek, F., & Neubauer, A. B. (2020). Experiments in the wild: Introducing the within-person encouragement design. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 55(2), 256–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2019.1627660

Schnauber, A. (2017). Medienselektion im Alltag: Die Rolle von Gewohnheiten im Selektionsprozess. Springer VS.

Schnauber-Stockmann, A., Bayer, J. B., Harari, G. M., & Karnowski, V. (2025). The situation in media and communication research. Communication Theory, 35(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtae021

Schnauber-Stockmann, A., & Karnowski, V. (2020). Mobile devices as tools for media and communication research: A scoping review on collecting self-report data in repeated measurement designs. Communication Methods and Measures, 14(3), 145–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1784402

Schnauber-Stockmann, A., & Mangold, F. (2020). Day-to-day routines of media platform use in the digital age: A structuration perspective. Communication Monographs, 87(4), 464–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2020.1758336

Schnauber-Stockmann, A., Meier, A., & Reinecke, L. (2018). Procrastination out of habit? The role of impulsive versus reflective media selection in procrastinatory media use. Media Psychology, 21(4), 640–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2018.1476156

Schnauber-Stockmann, A., & Naab, T. K. (2019). The process of forming a mobile media habit: Results of a longitudinal study in a real-world setting. Media Psychology, 22(5), 714–742. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2018.1513850

Schnauber-Stockmann, A., Scharkow, M., Karnowski, V., Naab, T. K., Schlütz, D., & Pressmann, P. (2025). Distinguishing person-specific from situation-specific variation in media use: A meta-analysis. Communication Research, 52(2), 143–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502241262664

Schnauber-Stockmann, A., Scharkow, M., Winkler, Y., Jost, P., & Denner, N. (2024). Datenanalyse mit R. https://stats.ifp.uni-mainz.de/ba-datenanalyse/

Schnell, R. (1997). Nonresponse in Bevölkerungsumfragen: Ausmaß, Entwicklung und Ursachen. Leske + Budrich.

Scholl, A. (2013). Reaktivität im Forschungsprozess. In W. Möhring & D. Schlütz (Hrsg.), Handbuch standardisierte Erhebungsverfahren in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (S. 79–99). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18776-1_5

Scholl, A. (2018). Die Befragung (4th ed.). UVK Verlagsgesellschaft mbH. https://doi.org/10.36198/9783838549989

Schorrlepp, L., Stadel, M., Bringmann, L. F., Hesselink, M., & Maciejewski, D. (2025). Utilizing qualitative methods to detect validity issues in clinical experience sampling methodology (ESM). Psychological Assessment, 37(11), 599–613. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001380

Schuurman, N. K., & Hamaker, E. L. (2019). Measurement error and person-specific reliability in multilevel autoregressive modeling. Psychological Methods, 24(1), 70–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000188

Schwartz, C. E., Bode, R., Repucci, N., Becker, J., Sprangers, M. A. G., & Fayers, P. M. (2006). The clinical significance of adaptation to changing health: A meta-analysis of response shift. Quality of Life Research, 15(9), 1533–1550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-006-0025-9

Schwarz, N. (2007). Retrospective and concurrent self-reports: The rationale for real-time data capture. In A. A. Stone, S. Shiffman, A. A. Atienza, & L. Nebeling (Hrsg.), The science of real-time data capture: Self-reports in health research (S. 11–26). Oxford University Press.

Schwarz, N., & Oyserman, D. (2001). Asking questions about behavior: Cognition, communication, and questionnaire construction. American Journal of Evaluation, 22(2), 127–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/109821400102200202

Scollon, C. N., Prieto, C.-K., & Diener, E. (2009). Experience sampling: Promises and pitfalls, strength and weaknesses. In A. C. Michalos & E. Diener (Hrsg.), Assessing Well-Being (Vol. 39, S. 157–180). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4_8

Sen, I., Flöck, F., Weller, K., Weiß, B., & Wagner, C. (2021). A total error framework for digital traces of human behavior on online platforms. Public Opinion Quarterly, 85(S1), 399–422. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfab018

Shalev, D., Naab, T. K., & Tsfati, Y. (2025). Self-reporting news use in situ and in retrospect. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 37(2), edaf027. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edaf027

Shrout, P. E., & Lane, S. P. (2012). Psychometics. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Hrsg.), Handbook of Research Methods for Studying Daily Life (S. 302–320). The Guilford Press.

Shrout, P. E., Stadler, G., Lane, S. P., McClure, M. J., Jackson, G. L., Clavél, F. D., Iida, M., Gleason, M. E. J., Xu, J. H., & Bolger, N. (2018). Initial elevation bias in subjective reports. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(1), E15–E23. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1712277115

Siebers, T., Beyens, I., Pouwels, J. L., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2022). Social media and distraction: An experience sampling study among adolescents. Media Psychology, 25(3), 343–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2021.1959350

Siebers, T., Beyens, I., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2024). The effects of fragmented and sticky smartphone use on distraction and task delay. Mobile Media & Communication, 12(1), 45–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579231193941

Silvia, P. J., Kwapil, T. R., Eddington, K. M., & Brown, L. H. (2013). Missed beeps and missing data: Dispositional and situational predictors of nonresponse in experience sampling research. Social Science Computer Review, 31(4), 471–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439313479902

Singer, E. (2018). The use and effects of incentives in surveys. In D. L. Vannette & J. A. Krosnick (Hrsg.), The Palgrave Handbook of Survey Research (S. 63–70). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54395-6_9

Slipetz, L. R., Falk, A., & Henry, T. R. (2023). Missing data in discrete time state-space modeling of ecological momentary assessment data: A Monte-Carlo study of imputation methods. arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.13144

Sliwinski, M. J. (2008). Measurement-burst designs for social health research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00043.x

Smyth, J. M., Jones, D. R., Wen, C. K. F., Materia, F. T., Schneider, S., & Stone, A. (2021). Influence of ecological momentary assessment study design features on reported willingness to participate and perceptions of potential research studies: An experimental study. BMJ Open, 11(7), e049154. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049154

Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2nd ed.). Sage.

Song, J., Howe, E., Oltmanns, J. R., & Fisher, A. J. (2023). Examining the concurrent and predictive validity of single items in ecological momentary assessments. Assessment, 30(5), 1662–1671. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911221113563

Soyster, P. D., Bosley, H. G., Reeves, J. W., Altman, A. D., & Fisher, A. J. (2019). Evidence for the feasibility of person-specific ecological momentary assessment across diverse populations and study designs. Journal for Person-Oriented Research, 5(2), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.17505/jpor.2019.06

Stawski, R. S., MacDonald, S. W. S., & Sliwinski, M. J. (2015). Measurement burst design. In S. K. Whitbourne (Hg.), The Encyclopedia of Adulthood and Aging (S. 1–5). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118521373.wbeaa313

Stier, S., Breuer, J., Siegers, P., & Thorson, K. (2020). Integrating survey data and digital trace data: Key issues in developing an emerging field. Social Science Computer Review, 38(5), 503–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319843669

Stone, A. A., Kessler, R. C., & Haythomthwatte, J. A. (1991). Measuring daily events and experiences: Decisions for the researcher. Journal of Personality, 59(3), 575–607. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1991.tb00260.x

Stone, A. A., Schneider, S., & Smyth, J. M. (2023). Evaluation of pressing issues in ecological momentary assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 19(1), 107–131. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-080921-083128

Stone, A. A., & Shiffman, S. (2002). Capturing momentary, self-report data: A proposal for reporting guidelines. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24(3), 236–243. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324796ABM2403_09

Struckmann, S., & Karnowski, V. (2016). News consumption in a changing media ecology: An MESM-study on mobile news. Telematics & Informatics, 33(2), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.08.012

Struminskaya, B., & Sakshaug, J. W. (2023). Ethical considerations for augmenting surveys with auxiliary data sources. Public Opinion Quarterly, 87(S1), 619–633. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfad030

Struminskaya, B., Toepoel, V., Lugtig, P., Haan, M., Luiten, A., & Schouten, B. (2021). Understanding willingness to share smartphone-sensor data. Public Opinion Quarterly, 84(3), 725–759. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfaa044

Sturgis, P., & Brunton-Smith, I. (2023). Personality and survey satisficing. Public Opinion Quarterly, 87(3), 689–718. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfad036

Sun, Y., & Pan, Z. (2020). Not published is not perished: Addressing publication bias in meta-analytic studies in communication. Human Communication Research, 46(2-3), 300–321. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqz015

Taddicken, M. (2013). Online-Befragung. In W. Möhring & D. Schlütz (Hrsg.), Handbuch standardisierte Erhebungsverfahren in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (S. 201–217). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18776-1_11

Thomas, F. (2022). A methodological framework for analyzing the appearance and duration of media effects. Journal of Communication, 72(3), 401–428. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqac013

Tiidenberg, K. (2018). Ethics in digital research. In U. Flick (Hg.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Collection (S. 466–479). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526416070.n30

Trull, T. J., & Ebner-Priemer, U. W. (2020). Ambulatory assessment in psychopathology research: A review of recommended reporting guidelines and current practices. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 129, 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000473

Tuerlinckx, F., Kuppens, P., Ariens, S., Cloos, L., Dejonckheere, E., Lafit, G., Niemeijer, K., Revol, J., Schat, E., Schreuder, M., Vanhasbroeck, N., & Ceulemans, E. (2026). New developments in experience sampling methodology. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 79, 46–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12398

Vachon, H., Viechtbauer, W., Rintala, A., & Myin-Germeys, I. (2019). Compliance and retention with the experience sampling method over the continuum of severe mental disorders: Meta-analysis and recommendations. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(12), e14475. https://doi.org/10.2196/14475

Valkenburg, P., Beyens, I., Pouwels, J. L., Driel, I. I. van, & Keijsers, L. (2021). Social media use and adolescents’ self-esteem: Heading for a person-specific media effects paradigm. Journal of Communication, 71(1), 56–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa039

Verbeij, T., Pouwels, J. L., Beyens, I., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2022). Experience sampling self-reports of social media use have comparable predictive validity to digital trace measures. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 7611. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11510-3

Verbeke, K., Krawczyk, T., Baeyens, D., Piasecki, J., & Borry, P. (2023). Informed consent and debriefing when deceiving participants: A systematic review of research ethics guidelines. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 18(3), 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646231173477

Vermunt, J. K. (2008). Latent class and finite mixture models for multilevel data sets. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 17(1), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280207081238

Vermunt, J. K., Langeheine, R., & Bockenholt, U. (1999). Discrete-time discrete-state latent Markov models with time-constant and time-varying covariates. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24(2), 179–207. https://doi.org/10.2307/1165200

Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2004). Latent class analysis. In M. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman, & T. Futing Liao (Hrsg.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods (S. 550–553). Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412950589.n472

Viechtbauer, W. (2022a). Statistical methods for ESM data. In I. Myin-Germeys & P. Kuppens (Hrsg.), The Open Handbook of Experience Sampling Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide to Designing, Conducting, and Analyzing ESM Studies (S. 153–184). The Center for Research on Experience Sampling; Ambulatory Methods Leuven (REAL).

Viechtbauer, W. (2022b). Structuring, checking, and preparing ESM data. In I. Myin-Germeys & P. Kuppens (Hrsg.), The Open Handbook of Experience Sampling Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide to Designing, Conducting, and Analyzing ESM Studies (S. 137–152). The Center for Research on Experience Sampling; Ambulatory Methods Leuven (REAL).

Vogelsmeier, L. V. D. E., Vermunt, J. K., & De Roover, K. (2022). How to explore within-person and between-person measurement model differences in intensive longitudinal data with the r package lmfa. Behavior Research Methods, 55, 2387–2422. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01898-1

Wagner, A., Schwarzenegger, C., & Gentzel, P. (2022). Recordings of digital media life: Advancing (qualitative) media diaries as a method. Studies in Communication Sciences, 22(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.24434/j.scoms.2022.01.3066

Wagner-Schelewsky, P., & Hering, L. (2019). Online-Befragung. In N. Baur & J. Blasius (Hrsg.), Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung (S. 787–800). Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21308-4_54

Weiß, B., Silber, H., Struminskaya, B., & Durrant, G. (2019). Mobile Befragungen. In N. Baur & J. Blasius (Hrsg.), Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung (S. 801–812). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21308-4_55

Welbers, K., Loecherbach, F., Lin, Z., & Trilling, D. (2024). Anything you would like to share: Evaluating a data donation application in a survey and field study. Computational Communication Research, 6(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.5117/CCR2024.2.5.WELB

Wen, C. K. F., Junghaenel, D. U., Newman, D. B., Schneider, S., Mendez, M., Goldstein, S. E., Velasco, S., Smyth, J. M., & Stone, A. A. (2021). The effect of training on participant adherence with a reporting time frame for momentary subjective experiences in ecological momentary assessment: Cognitive interview study. JMIR Formative Research, 5(5), e28007. https://doi.org/10.2196/28007

Wicherts, J. M., Veldkamp, C. L. S., Augusteijn, H. E. M., Bakker, M., Aert, R. C. M. van, & Assen, M. A. L. M. van. (2016). Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-hacking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1832. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832

Wickham, H., Cetinkaya-Rundel, M., & Grolemund, G. (2023). R for data science (2nd ed.). https://r4ds.hadley.nz/

Wieland, M., Herbertz, A., Krone, J., & Otto, L. (2025). ESM tool collection. https://doi.org/osf.io/um87t/

Wilhelm, P., Perrez, M., & Pawlik, K. (2012). Conducting research in daily life: A historical review. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Hrsg.), Handbook of Research Methods for Studying Daily Life (S. 62–86). The Guilford Press.

Wolf, C., Joye, D., Smith, T., Fu, Y., Lyberg, L. E., & Weisberg, H. F. (2016). Total survey error: A paradigm for survey methodology. In The SAGE Handbook of Survey Methodology (S. 27–40). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957893.n3

Wolfers, L., & Baumgartner, S. (2025). Short but still valid: Validating single-item measures for key communication science constructs for experience sampling research. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/zkwxa_v1

Wright, A. G. C., Beltz, A. M., Gates, K. M., Molenaar, P. C. M., & Simms, L. J. (2015). Examining the dynamic structure of daily internalizing and externalizing behavior at multiple levels of analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1914. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01914

Wünsch, C., Briselat, T., Reitmeier, S., Keil, J., & Czichon, M. (2023). Skala Spannungserleben (SSE). Entwicklung einer Skala zur postrezeptiven Erfassung von Spannungserleben während der Rezeption narrativer Inhalte. Studies in Communication and Media, 12(2-3), 115–146. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2023-2-3-115

Yan, T., & Curtin, R. (2010). The relation between unit nonresponse and item nonresponse: A response continuum perspective. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22(4), 535–551. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edq037

Zhu, J. J. H., Chen, H., Peng, T.-Q., Liu, X. F., & Dai, H. (2018). How to measure sessions of mobile phone use? Quantification, evaluation, and applications. Mobile Media & Communication, 6(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157917748351

Zillich, A. F., Schlütz, D., Roehse, E.-M., Link, E., & Möhring, W. (2023). Practicing internet research ethics: Challenges and solutions from a German perspective. Comunicazioni Sociali, (2), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.26350/001200_000185

Zimmermann, F., & Kohring, M. (2020). Mistrust, disinforming news, and vote choice: A panel survey on the origins and consequences of believing disinformation in the 2017 german parliamentary election. Political Communication, 37(2), 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1686095